|
Post by johnm on May 6, 2017 13:07:33 GMT 12
I subscribe to NZ aviation news (may 2017 ed) ........... and always enjoy Jim Bergmans accounts of his flying career
(I hope I get this in the right context if you read this Jim) - he mentioned that he did some ag flying but gave it away - on a day he was one of 2 Airtruks working - the other pilot was experienced. He was slower applying tonnage because he was flying downhill (slower) whereas the other pilot was flying the opposite direction into a cul-de-sac (faster) to get to the sowing area and presumably sorting things out as he went that way
the slower Airtruk was sometimes holding up the faster Airtruk - at loading with the less tonnage as a result (and bonus) - at smoko the experienced pilot made the comment to Jim 'mate your an ag pilot, if you are not prepared to put your head in a noose you should n't be doing it'.
Jim stopped ag flying at about that point
...................... posted purely in the interests of ag flying chatter ...........................
|
|
|
Post by kiwiduster1 on May 6, 2017 15:50:48 GMT 12
Hells teeth:::: No pressure then!! Wonder if the senior guy is with us today?? Thinking old and bold etc.
|
|
|
Post by Dave Homewood on May 6, 2017 16:54:53 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by The Red Baron on May 7, 2017 18:45:38 GMT 12
Depends on the era but there was a time when ag operations charged out on the 'ton mile system' where the farmer paid a set price for each ton spread,depending on how many miles the job was from the airstrip.With that system there wouldn't have been the pressure to cut time as there was under the hourly rate charge out system.
|
|
|
Post by johnm on May 9, 2017 19:40:41 GMT 12
Dont know the intracacies t red b
Would have thought ton mile or hourly rate would be no pressure on the pilot ana all pressure on the farmers pocket !
Assume now its a per tonne rate with some creative accounting on the cost and delivery of the fertilizer - reference to the big fert companies that own aircraft
As a pure guess a cresco unit would have to be $ 1,750 per hour say 20 tonnes per hour = & 80 / tonne approx
Not that anyones gunna give away too many secrets here
|
|
|
Post by isc on May 9, 2017 22:49:31 GMT 12
You might have been working harder with a Tigermoth, or a PA 18A. isc
|
|
|
Post by eieio on May 10, 2017 20:27:54 GMT 12
$80/ tonne several years ago for fert,lime a bit less .Who needs a Cresco, saw a ground spreader today ,6x6 ,tractor lug tyres ,[probably 400 horsepower ,where it cant go aint worth the cost of fert plus spreading ,say at least $420 per tone .Just cost me $1000 for 3'5 tonne by helicopter. I use the chopper due to geography of the land involved ,
|
|
|
Post by davidd on May 11, 2017 9:36:57 GMT 12
A bit of historical perspective. In the early 1960s my father said (at the time) that he was paid 10 shillings for every ton of fertiliser flown off his strip which was located right beside the summit road on Banks Peninsula, between Hilltop hotel and the Pigeon Bay road turnoff (on the saddle between Pigeon Bay and Duvauchelle). Aircraft being operated at this time included C.180 BWK (Aerial Sowing, Ken Eden) and Pawnee 235 BYY (Airwork, Roger Crow). A while later Dad found out that other farmers in the general area were being paid one pound per ton. This probably has nothing to do with what the pilots in question were paid - I think the cost of using the strip fell on the owner of the property which was receiving the fertiliser, although this was possibly collected by the company from the client, then paid out to Dad. The great advantages of Dad's strip included its central location on the peninsula, its proximity to a good sealed road (about 50 metres away, which made delivery of the fertiliser very simple and safe), and its height above sea level, which meant that pilots, once airborne, were practically already at or above the height of just about all properties requiring applications, in fact for many jobs the pilot simply dropped off the end of the strip (which must have been about 1,000 feet above sea level) and cruised to the dropping area. However cross winds could be an issue, but as spreading fertiliser normally required nil wind (farmers hated seeing "their" fertiliser being blown onto their neighbour's land, or onto parts of their own land that did not require it). Dad sometimes watched the topdressing operations, but could only be there a fraction of the time, so he probably could not personally check on the actual tonnage dropped, so had to rely on the honesty of the topdressing company. I imagine that the latter simply relied on the amount of fertiliser (in tons) trucked to the bin, to get the tonnage figures. What pilots were paid was between them and their employer (the company). You could probably count the number of sorties the aircraft was flying (even if there were two of them on the same job) but this could only give the roughest estimate, as the actual payload on any particular flight was at the discretion of the pilot. However if conditions were near to ideal, it was almost certainly the case that the maximum load was aboard. On a still autumn day, the sound of a C.180 in particular at full power in fine pitch carried a great distance. However if there was just too much wind drift, the planes were grounded, waiting it out. David D
|
|
|
Post by johnm on Oct 22, 2018 17:10:20 GMT 12
1. test
|
|
|
Post by johnm on Oct 23, 2018 10:31:23 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by Dave Homewood on Oct 23, 2018 14:27:47 GMT 12
Does this help?
|
|
|
Post by ErrolC on Oct 23, 2018 15:13:00 GMT 12
That's a complicated way to do what Flickr makes easy!! Click the pretty cartoon arrow, per this helpful post at UK Airshow Review - as you obviously have the photos in Flickr already, start at step 6. forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=58015
|
|
|
Post by johnm on Oct 23, 2018 17:06:09 GMT 12
test 2 ................... ! thanks Peter and Dave - I knew you'd answer my cries of help hood aerodrome - may 62 - niel middlemiss and ray wells (L driver) Image_01 by john middlemiss, on Flickr
|
|
|
Post by johnnyfalcon on Oct 23, 2018 17:12:19 GMT 12
Oh that is nice!!
|
|
|
Post by Dave Homewood on Oct 23, 2018 21:46:09 GMT 12
That's a great photo!
|
|
|
Post by kiwiduster1 on Oct 24, 2018 11:41:41 GMT 12
Pure gold!
|
|