|
Post by hardyakka on Mar 13, 2021 20:14:54 GMT 12
Now that the court decision is out, I hope it is ok to have a bit of discussion. I have read the whole 159 page document and a few things are apparent. 1. Justice Mallon is very, very, very thorough. 2. There are a lot of assumptions I’ve made about airshow procedures that are “commonly accepted” which do not stand up in court. Everything must be clearly stated and preferably written down. Doesn’t matter who you are or how long you’ve being doing it. 3. Seeing how big a world of hurt in which you can end up, it is astounding that anyone would take on the job of running a major airshow. The fact that people do it voluntarily is worthy of our deepest respect. Read the full decision here : Court Decision Document
|
|
|
Post by campbellbox on Mar 14, 2021 14:02:07 GMT 12
Thanks for posting the link to the decision. You make a hell of a good point Hardyakka - an airshow is a massive undertaking with a huge number of potentially lethal moving parts. We're bloody lucky anyone takes the time to put them together.
|
|
|
Post by chbessexboy on Mar 14, 2021 21:53:31 GMT 12
Well I know of 3 lining up to buy it as is so..... I'm just glad the intention is to repair it and retain ownership at this stage. It would be very hard to sell it in damaged condition and the crash be the last experience with it. I hope he can get some more pleasure out of it to help erase what must have been a terrible thing to go through - including the court case. My meaning is that it would be hard on Arthur Dovey from an emotional point of view to sell it in damaged condition and not have the satisfaction of repairing and re-flying it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 10:42:27 GMT 12
The decision certainly isn't a light read but it is worth going through to better understand the accident and overall situation.
|
|
|
Post by mcmaster on Mar 18, 2021 13:49:42 GMT 12
Interesting judgement to read. The holes in the Swiss cheese lined up right from the change in display, briefing, runway inspection and tower comms issues. Odd someone suggested the Yak calling 3 greens to the tower was "antiquated", still very much a thing at least in military circles.
|
|
|
Post by aeromuzz on Dec 22, 2021 14:41:04 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2021 15:19:18 GMT 12
Thanks for the link, aeromuzz.
|
|
|
Post by aeromuzz on Oct 18, 2022 8:11:06 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by chbessexboy on Nov 29, 2022 19:01:15 GMT 12
Very pleased to learn that the Yak will be staying in NZ!
|
|
|
Post by Dave Homewood on Nov 29, 2022 19:17:38 GMT 12
Yes, with Carl Jackson at Omaka, where it will be rebuilt.
|
|
|
Post by ErrolC on Nov 29, 2022 19:20:32 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by aeromuzz on Nov 30, 2022 7:16:34 GMT 12
One down, 3 to go. Let's hope that the Corsair, Mustang and Kittyhawk stay in NZ too.
|
|
|
Post by Dave Homewood on Nov 30, 2022 8:43:05 GMT 12
And the Catalina!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2022 13:44:24 GMT 12
Excellent news!
|
|
|
Post by FlyingKiwi on Nov 30, 2022 17:49:05 GMT 12
That's really good news, looking forward to seeing it back in the skies again.
|
|