|
Post by planecrazy on Jul 16, 2023 19:54:26 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by baz62 on Jul 16, 2023 21:35:40 GMT 12
Pretty sure the two seat A4 mod was done in the US.
|
|
|
Post by planecrazy on Jul 16, 2023 21:45:53 GMT 12
Pretty sure the two seat A4 mod was done in the US. Thank you baz, wonder why they did them with two single seat canopies instead of like the RNZAF and RAN two seaters? I guess there is a reason for this be interested to hear the pros and/or cons of the different styles of two seater canopies?     
|
|
|
Post by tbf2504 on Jul 17, 2023 9:45:11 GMT 12
I believe that the reason for their "T" bird configuration was they got a "job" lot price on a batch of single seaters and the conversion to the two seat using those airframes was more economical than purchasing new standard "T" birds which were in short supply at that time, and they would have to wait for them to be built.
|
|
|
Post by obiwan27 on Jul 17, 2023 10:04:36 GMT 12
Pretty sure the two seat A4 mod was done in the US. Thank you baz, wonder why they did them with two single seat canopies instead of like the RNZAF and RAN two seaters? I guess there is a reason for this be interested to hear the pros and/or cons of the different styles of two seater canopies?      Wikipedia has info on the two seater and other A4 aircraft specifically purchased and modified for use by the RSAF. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ST_Aerospace_A-4SU_Super_Skyhawk"The TA-4S trainers were not the standard TA-4 with a common cockpit for the student and instructor pilot, but were instead rebuilt by Lockheed with a 28-inch (710 mm) fuselage plug inserted into the front fuselage and a separate bulged cockpit (giving better all round visibility) for the instructor seated behind the student pilot. This arrangement was unique for the RSAF but was not the first by Lockheed (the Lockheed SR-71B and U-2CT/U-2RT/TR-1B/TU-2S trainers also used stepped cockpits). As such converted/rebuilt airframes, these TA-4S trainers were powered by the original Wright J65 turbojet engines as used in the B/C models instead of the Pratt & Whitney J52 used by the purpose-built TA-4E/Fs tandem-seaters from Douglas assembly line; this was the main reason why the RSAF decided to not procure the TA-4E/Fs (if indeed an order was placed) and then having to maintain two different engines to power essentially the same aircraft type (a scenario not unlike having a fleet within a fleet)"
|
|
|
Post by obiwan27 on Jul 17, 2023 10:04:47 GMT 12
Pretty sure the two seat A4 mod was done in the US. Thank you baz, wonder why they did them with two single seat canopies instead of like the RNZAF and RAN two seaters? I guess there is a reason for this be interested to hear the pros and/or cons of the different styles of two seater canopies?      Wikipedia has info on the two seater and other A4 aircraft specifically purchased and modified for use by the RSAF. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ST_Aerospace_A-4SU_Super_Skyhawk"The TA-4S trainers were not the standard TA-4 with a common cockpit for the student and instructor pilot, but were instead rebuilt by Lockheed with a 28-inch (710 mm) fuselage plug inserted into the front fuselage and a separate bulged cockpit (giving better all round visibility) for the instructor seated behind the student pilot. This arrangement was unique for the RSAF but was not the first by Lockheed (the Lockheed SR-71B and U-2CT/U-2RT/TR-1B/TU-2S trainers also used stepped cockpits). As such converted/rebuilt airframes, these TA-4S trainers were powered by the original Wright J65 turbojet engines as used in the B/C models instead of the Pratt & Whitney J52 used by the purpose-built TA-4E/Fs tandem-seaters from Douglas assembly line; this was the main reason why the RSAF decided to not procure the TA-4E/Fs (if indeed an order was placed) and then having to maintain two different engines to power essentially the same aircraft type (a scenario not unlike having a fleet within a fleet)"
|
|
|
Post by skyhawkdon on Jul 17, 2023 16:03:07 GMT 12
When Malaysia bought their A-4s they faced the same problem, no second-hand TA-4s were available so they made their own from single seat airframes but used the standard TA-4 configuration/canopy. I think Lockheed did theirs as well. The Singapore T-bird was certainly a funny looking beast.
|
|
|
Post by 30sqnatc on Jul 17, 2023 19:42:01 GMT 12
Devastated. No Short Skyvan .... their most boootiful aircraft. Well almost.
|
|